icWales logo
icWales jobswales homeswales icMotors Dating
Search icWales for:
  Home page
   News
   Business
   RugbyNation
   SoccerNation
   Sports
   Country & Farming
   What's on
       Arts and Ents
       On the box
       TV & Radio listings
       Dining Out
       Reviews
       Messageboard
   Your Wales
   Celebrity Wales
   Capital City
   Around Wales
   photosales
   Business search
   Dating
   jobswales
   homeswales
   icMotors
   Classified Ads
   WM
   Holidays
   Expats
   Community zone
   E-cards
   Weather
   Contact us
   Win £1million


Heat on Charl as mag tackles weighty issue

Jan 12 2006

Hannah Jones, Western Mail

 

When is size 12 overweight? When it's the size of a celebrity splashed across the front cover of a magazine. Hannah Jones reports

WHAT does it take for an artist to be taken seriously?

I mean really seriously - the kind of seriously that doesn't depend on who they're going out with, the size of their bank balance or if they can pinch more than in inch.

What will it take for people to say Catherine Zeta-Jones is a really great actress?

An Oscar on her mantelpiece hasn't quite done the trick, as the media is still more interested in how many wrinkles hubbie Michael Douglas has, if our Cath is sporting a fringe or not, or if she had lessons to get that Welsh-hued Atlantic drawl just right.

What she does on camera is almost secondary to how she lives her life.

Luckily, the papers don't have to worry about her putting on weight, but can you imagine if she did?

You just see the headlines now - "Zeta eatsa her own bodyweight overnight."

But with a body to die for and genetic make-up which should be bottled, she's not going to have to put up with the constant jibes and acerbic asides about her size.

Yes, she has a bosom - but she's never going to be called buxom because of it.

Which brings me to the subject of our other national treasure, the "fuller figured" Charlotte Church.

Now when I say "fuller figured" I am talking about a size 12 here. I'm not talking a size 14-16 or "roly poly" 18-20.

But I am talking without the aid of my celebritese goggles, which zones in on the international language of euphemism.

What's our Charl got to do to prove her talent scores more than her dress size?

Has she got to be one of the biggest-selling UK artists of last year? Check.

Has she got to prove that she's made the transition from Voice of an Angel to serious pop star? Check.

Has she got to be nominated for a Brit Award as a potential Best Female of the Year? Check, as of Monday.

None of this really matters of course, because people would rather read about our Charl, the girl who proclaims she's a "natural fat girl", being lambasted for having a problem with her weight.

The charge has come from top celebrity magazine, Heat.

In this week's issue they've printed a relatively old and unflattering picture of Cardiff's finest on the front cover in a relatively unflattering pose.

Taken from a Top of the Pops angle - you know, like the snapper is sitting on the floor looking up into the folds of your double chin - she certainly doesn't look like a skinny girl.

But she still, even in skin tight jeans, cropped white T and bright gold shrug, looks a size 12. She'd need the use of magic House of Fun mirrors to turn her into a lump of lard.

The writers of Heat, once they hooked you in with their "Charlotte's Weight Battle" front page headline, take a more softly softly approach inside the magazine.

No longer is the singer a thunder thighs, but a "normal" girl whose weight, just like everyone else's, yo-yos.

Hello? That's what's called being a woman.

I'm flummoxed by the current coverage of so-called "curvy and voluptuous" stars like Charlotte.

On the one hand we're told that looking super-skinny is now deemed bad by the media (as well as all doctors, nutritionists and mums up and down the country), but why do magazines think simply adding the word "curvy" to a picture caption will make it seem as if they're genuinely featuring fuller figured celebrities on their pages? Let's look at the evidence again.

Zeta-Jones's already mentioned, and Beyonc and Jennifer Lopez are known for their "big" bottoms. But the last time I looked out of my fringe of jealousy, they were still the owners of itsy-bitsy sized derri res.

I for one am pleased to see skeletal celebs chastised, but claiming normal sized women like Charlotte have a weight problem just because they go from a size 10 to a 12 is not an improvement. Remember this simple equation - the opposite of Nicole Richie Hilton is Bella Emberg, not Jessica Alba.

We'll leave the last word on the subject to our "curvy", Chinese food-loving, bacon sarnie-munching, Cheeky Vimto-swigging Crazy Chick Charlotte Church.

As she puts it, "I'm happy with my figure."

And so she should be - she's a perfect size 12.

 

Top Top | Back Back | E-mail to a friend | Printable version

 

 


Copyright and Trade Mark Notice
owned by or licensed to Trinity Mirror Plc 2006
icWalesTM is a trade mark of Trinity Mirror Plc.
Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Statement before using this site.
 
Advertisements

Find your new job:

 
 
  e.g. secretary

 
  e.g. Cardiff or CF1

What's On - Arts and Entertainment around Wales

Mike Peters exclusive - Family and fatherhood

Search For Events
 
Event type :
Date of event :
or search for event by keyword
Add your event
Films on general release

Celebrity news
Weather
Traffic Watch
Rugby fixtures
Soccer results
Virtual Tour
Holidays

Movie reviews
DVD & video reviews
Album reviews
Single reviews
Game reviews
Book reviews